Cooperation in Primates and Humans: Mechanisms and Evolution by Peter Kappeler, Carel P. van Schaik

By Peter Kappeler, Carel P. van Schaik

Each person within the box of animal and human habit should still pass over this booklet. The authors are the superior of their line of analysis, the study is kind of brand new, and some of the authors supplement one another's discovering beautifully.

The dating among human and non-human primate habit is essential for elucidating the features of person species simply because, because it seems, it's always a lot more uncomplicated to spot a sort of habit by means of viewing it as a part of a bigger swath of habit occuring in a number of species, instead of viewing the habit in isolation. it really is specially tricky to problematize human habit simply because, this being our personal species, we have a tendency to see as 'natural' or the straightforward made of human cognitive skill, what's in truth, a hugely constructed model (such as imitation). during this regard, it's going to were great to incorporate a bankruptcy or on cooperation in quite a few species of birds, in particular nesting birds, that percentage a lot with primates when it comes to social association, intelligence, and behavior.

The publication manages to prevent the back-biting and interminable recriminations that regularly accompany biologically orientated examine into human and primate nature. there's, in spite of the fact that, one exception. Robert Trivers makes an attempt to save lots of his 35 12 months outdated thought from pageant via more moderen theories through launching a sour assault at the more recent authors (of which i'm one). He does so no longer through facing the problems, yet by means of selectively quoting out of context and trying to make his competitors glance foolish and silly. they don't seem to be. certainly, they're with no a lot doubt, basically right in suggesting gene-culture coevolutionary forces as crucial to cooperation in huge teams of unrelated people. this doesn't in any respect compromise Trivers' fantastic paintings, which addresses dyadic interactions on my own.

Show description

Read Online or Download Cooperation in Primates and Humans: Mechanisms and Evolution PDF

Best developmental psychology books

Child Development and Education: A Piagetian Perspective

A set of essays masking a extensive variety of themes, together with day care, the roots of homosexuality, generational clash, and kid's ideas of existence and demise. "Richly suggestive. " --Contemporary Psychology

Evolution Challenges: Integrating Research and Practice in Teaching and Learning about Evolution

A up to date ballot published that one in 4 americans think in either creationism and evolution, whereas one other forty-one% think that creationism is right and evolution is fake. A minority (only 13%) think merely in evolution. Given the common resistance to the concept that people and different animals have advanced and given the eye to the continuing debate of what may be taught in public faculties, matters concerning the educating and studying of evolution are fairly well timed.

Distance Relationships: Intimacy and Emotions Amongst Academics and Their Partners in Dual-Locations

Drawing on interviews with united kingdom in distance relationships, this publication seeks to give an explanation for, assessment and develop sociological debates approximately intimate existence. It offers a wealthy and human viewpoint on how our bodies, feelings and connections to others are key in holding intimate relationships.

Extra info for Cooperation in Primates and Humans: Mechanisms and Evolution

Sample text

Females tend to settle near their mothers, creating a matrilineal community of females, which includes females of several generations. Males tend to disperse farther than females, sometimes over large distances. The matrilineal structure of this population emerges from genetic analyses, not from behavioral observations as females are not gregarious and do not participate in cooperative activities or share nests. In grey mouse lemurs, Microcebus murinus, this pattern is elaborated slightly further.

This weight loss is striking because these males lived in undemanding environments with free access to food, no need to move from one feeding site to another, and no predators. Both kinship and direct benefits may sustain cooperation in callitrichid groups (Garber 1996). Kinship seems to affect the extent of reproductive skew among females in one population of golden lion tamarins. Approximately 10% of females share reproduction with subordinate females for one or two years. Females are most likely to share breeding with their own daughters, less commonly with sisters, and rarely with unrelated females.

Finally, primate females form strong and enduring ties with their offspring, and this may inadvertently generate high rates of association among siblings and other types of maternal kin (Chapais 2001, Chapais & Bélisle 2004). Kin biases in association may be reflected in kin biases in behavior, but interactions among kin may be regulated by processes other than kin selection. Here, my goal is to review the evidence for nepotism and kin selection in primate groups from the perspective of these recent critiques.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.93 of 5 – based on 6 votes